|
WaPo Editorial: Overreach at Bagram |
|
|
Wednesday, January 7, 2009;
Page A14
In its last days, the administration is still making counterproductive arguments about detainees.
EVEN IN its waning days and despite several rebukes by the Supreme
Court, the Bush administration continues to espouse extreme theories
about the detention of terrorism suspects.
...
In a conventional war, where hostilities are formally declared and
suspended and combatants are easily identified by the uniforms of their
countries, federal judges have rightly been loath to interfere with the
battlefield decisions of the executive. But the indefinite nature of
the war against terrorism and the ease with which combatants can blend
in with civilian populations means that the executive requires more
flexibility in fighting the enemy and more checks and balances to
ensure that innocents are not wrongly swept up. After all, it is also
in the nation's interest to make sure that it detains only those who
would do it harm.
...
Full Story (link )
|